Do propose a tamper-proof method to share logs, do convince Linden Lab to modify the TOS to share them (and to reprogram the system to permit this possibility, including a yet undetermined but still automatic and equally f ool-proof and abuse-proof way to establish when and under which circumstances the criteria will be met to allow limited or unlimited sharing of private conversations), and then “honesty will win”, as you’d say. It’s a technical and procedural question, if you will. It’s not a question of honesty, but of verifiability. because you haven’t universally established yet that you are honest, or why the first person to share his/her log should be the one to be trusted, as you implied. and even this wouldn’t be proof, since the logs happen to be simple, unencrypted, plain-text files exceedingly easy to tamper with, before proceeding with that hypotetical remote connection.Īnd second, this doesn’t mean “that the honest ones lose out”. First, even if someone happened to log in with your account, that person would not be able to review your IM logs, because these are only stored locally (at least to residents, even you), so his/her computer would not have such log stored you’d have to actually give that person full access to your entire system through some remote connection program, so that he/she could see your local files. Princess Gata wrote: I guess this means the honest ones lose out, even if I gave someone in charge the information to log in as me and see the exchange
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |